Information, reviews, and miscellaneous shorts focusing on professional, nonprofit theater—from a Southeast Minnesota perspective.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

A Midnight Dreary

By Scott Dixon; directed by Harold N. Cropp
Commonweal Theatre, Lannesboro, MN

The Commonweal’s “November Nights” offering is entering the last weekend of its all-to-short run. This play is an engaging look into the writings and persona of Edgar Allen Poe. Jerome Yorke is extremely flexible depicting Poe in a range of ages and emotional states from young child to the tormented mind of a man afraid that his work may not be significant enough to survive him. He is joined by a cast of revolving characters from his past and supported by eerie lighting effects and a lush, nearly non-stop sound track. In A Midnight Dreary, we experience a talented company fully engaged in the process of creating an important work.

Scott Dixon’s play is impressive for both its arrangement of time and its elegant prose that moves back and forth between stage dialog and Poe’s poetry. Dixon creates a vivid picture of what makes Poe an intriguing character and what makes Poe’s work so unique and important to American letters.

While the play merits a full review, these few lines will have to suffice, along with my urging to see play in its final weekend. This world premier production is among the most important and enjoyable works in Southeast Minnesota this year.

A Midnight Dreary runs through November 15
Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Monday, October 12, 2009

UW-L presents Escape from Happiness

Escape from Happiness poster

Escape from Happiness by George F. Walker, directed by Walter Elder
Friday October 16 - 18 and Oct 22 - 25
Toland Theatre in UW-L's Center for the Arts
University of Wisconsin La Crosse

See Terry Rindfleisch's ariticle from the La Crosse Tribune

For more tickets and times, visit the UW-L Department of Theatre Arts on the web or call the box office: (608) 785-8522.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Penumbra Theatre Presents August Wilson's Radio Golf

Radio Golf at Penumbra

By August Wilson, Directed by Lou Bellamy

Penumbra’s committment to produce all 10 of Wilson’s Twentieth Century Cycle plays continues with its current production of Radio Golf. Radio Golf is the last play written in the cycle and is the only Wilson play that the company has not yet performed during its more than 30 years of productions. It will be the fourth play, following The Piano Lesson, Gem of the Ocean and Fences, in this current commitment to produce all of the plays in the cycle.

Set in 1997, Wilson uses Radio Golf to continue the themes that evolved during the 10-play cycle and to re-introduce characters—the descendents of characters—from the earlier plays. Wilson also returns to the same Pittsburgh neighborhood where Harmon Wilks hopes his efforts to re-build the Hill District will be the key to becoming Pittsburgh’s first black mayor. But his ambitions must contend with the Hill District’s past and the rich mythology that Wilson has created in the cycle.

Radio Golf plays October 1 - October 25.

Listen to Minnesota Public Radio story on Radio Golf

Visit the Penumbra for schedules and tickets: Penumbra Theatre

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

The Rainmaker

by N. Richard Nash, directed by Jamie Horton
Commonweal Theatre (August 3, 2009)

Starbuck thunders into the Curry family’s kitchen midway through the first act of the Commonweal’s production of The Rainmaker and disrupts a heated family argument and instantly heightens the divisions within the family. And once the rainmaker enters their lives, things will not be the same.

The rainmaker character is a familiar trope for modern theater goers: a stranger enters a stable community and shakes things up, leaving the people forever changed. This familiarity with the trope along with the 50 years that have passed since the original staging of he play could certainly work against a successful modern staging of The Rainmaker. But the Commonweal’s staging of the play is compelling and fresh—the story itself may be old, but the fears and insecurities, hopes and dreams have not lost their power to move an audience. And when done well, as the company has done here, audiences are still attracted to a mysterious stranger and the ordinary people who fall under the stranger’s spell.

Adam Whisner’s Starbuck proves both threatening and seductive as his confident and erratic behavior throws the Curry family off guard and, remarkably, prepares them for his sales pitch. Brandishing an ominous, yet ridiculously crude, magic wand, Whisner, as the consummate salesman/con man, sells to what each member of the family needs.

Starbuck has done his homework. He has cased the Curry’s farm and knows what shape the cattle are in and how many have already succumbed to the drought. But he has also assessed the conditions inside the home. While playwright Nash lets the audience know about Starbuck’s external intelligence gathering, the Commonweal production has him eavesdropping outside the kitchen door. Because of the slatted back wall, the audience can see a shadow of a person outside the wall, but until his entrance, the audience isn’t sure if they are seeing a stage hand or just the shadow of another character. But from his vantage outside the door, Starbuck is able to learn that the family has been trying to find a husband for Lizzie, that an expected suitor had not shown up for dinner, that the simple minded Jimmy is regularly bullied by his older brother, and much more. In short, he has gathered enough information to know what motivates his customers. And for a good sales person, knowing a customer’s motivation makes the sale all the more likely.

The play’s main tension is between the outlaw Starbuck and the family’s self anointed keeper, Noah. Nash has drawn Noah as a one dimensional character who uses numbers and logic to shield his family from possible embarrassment and disappointment. Carl Lindberg is able to fill out the role nicely, creating a character fuller than Nash penned and anchoring the hard boiled side of the battle. Named with a bit of irony, Noah represents drought and a lifeless, passionless, and pragmatic life. But Nash has tipped his hand a bit by creating Starbuck as the more dynamic character. While Noah represents the stability of a drought, Starbuck represents the volatility of rain. But the battle between the competing views of life are fought not directly between these two men but within the hearts and minds of Noah’s siblings, Jimmy and Lizzie.

Starbuck sees a repressed life force in both Lizzie and Jimmy, and as the salesman, he is selling to that repression. While Jimmy is an easy sell, Lizzie is much more complicated. She is moving toward an acceptance of what she sees as the hand that life has dealt her. Starbuck is determined that she should strive for more. While the choices and attitudes over a young woman’s imminent spinsterhood have changed considerably over the more than 50 years since the play was written, there is enough that holds true in the cultural attitudes and social realities for Lizzie’s fears to remain powerfully relevant.

Adrienne Sweeney is able to convey the embarrassment of being shopped out by her well-meaning family and the pain of hearing her person discussed like a piece of cattle. Her description of her fate as the spinster aunt is simply heartbreaking in its truth and seeming inevitability.

Perhaps the most uncomfortable and dated (well, perhaps not so dated if it still makes us uncomfortable) message of the play is the empowerment that both Jimmy and Lizzie experience after their individual sexual encounters. Is Nash echoing a boorish male bravado that says a woman simply needs a good roll in the hay to set herself right? Certainly Nash is siding with the belief that natural life forces, including sex, are inherently healthy and that repression of these life forces is unhealthy—and sex is a convenient symbol of this life force. Interestingly, it is only Noah who finds anything objectionable in Lizzie’s late night meeting with Starbuck. Even her father, the laid-back H.C. Curry (played this evening by the even more laid-back Hal Cropp) protects his daughter’s privacy with a man Curry knows to be a con man, probably not “the marrying kind.”

While droughts kills slowly, rains can devastate in an instant. Jimmy seems to have chosen to embrace the storm, whatever it brings, but Lizzie begins to see that she may have other options, options that she may not have been able to see before she learned that she could embrace the storm.

While the audience is most concerned with what will happen to Lizzie, the story of the Rainmaker is Starbuck’s. He has proved the consummate salesman. He has made his sale and has collected his money. But his real thrill comes from watching his own skill at maneuvering people to see that what he is selling is the thing that they most need.

The Commonweal’s The Rainmaker is both a thought provoking drama about human fears and repressions and a playful look at our fascination with men and women who make big promises, feed our biggest dreams, and play on our biggest fears. Most of us are either living in fear that a rainmaker will shake up our life or in hope that our own rainmaker will make us an offer.

The Rainmaker plays in repertory with The Odd Couple through October 24.
Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Jon Hassler Theater presents its Summer Sampler

John Hassler Theater
The Jon Hassler is offering four smaller productions for each of the weekends in August under the title the Hassler Summer Sampler: Cool Entertainment to Combat the Late Summer Heat. The first Sampler is a look at Bill Holm's whimsical yet serious look at the boxelder bug. Minneota, Minnesota Bill Holm died this past November and the Hassler is returning to his Boxelder Bug Varriations as a tribute to the poet.

Boxelder Bug Variations: A Tribute to author Bill Holm

August 8th 8:00 p.m.

Bill Holm

Minnesota poet Bill Holm set down his musings on boxelder bugs in both word and music in his 1985 book, Boxelder Bug Variations. Sally Childs first adapted Holm's work to the stage in 1987, incorporating music and dance. This production will be Child's third reworking of the production, and the second for the Jon Hassler.

Boxelder Bug Variations, in its reading format, will feature Twin Cities actors Terry Lynn Carlson, Beth Desotelle and Suzanna Winter who were also featured in the 2001 presentation of the work at the Hassler; Jon Hassler Theater Producer and General Manager Carter Martin (making a rare foray onto the stage), and Childs herself providing narration. Preceding the presentation, poet John Rezmerksi, who works with the Holm estate, will speak on Holm's legacy. Childs will also provide a history of the show's beginnings and will be supported by excerpts from Holm's book of essays, "The Music of Failure" read by Nancy Gormley and Angela Griffin, accompanied by slides of the prairie taken by Nancy Campbell.

Wisecracks From My Father

Leslye Orr

by Leslye Orr
August 14, 15; 8:00 p.m.

Featuring the return of the delightfully zany Leslye Orr with her new one-woman show, Wisecracks from My Father, in which she relates episodes from her father's life—growing up in St. Paul during the Depression era, living at the Angus Hotel, surviving Spam during WWII, and becoming the father of eight kids while delivering 10,000 more as an OBGYN in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

What I Want to Be When I Grow Up!

David Harris

by David Harris
August 22, 7:00 p.m.

David Harris will delight audiences of all ages with this adept and wacky physical comedy show. What I Want to be When I Grow Up! is acrobatic theater in action! Follow the incredible adventures of a would be super-hero, professional bowler, adventure tourist and lasso slinging cowboy. Each adventure is packed with goofy fun, daring stunts, and amazing skill. Watch David dream the dream of becoming anything imaginable. 100% safe for audiences of all ages.

Revelations of Mann

David Mann

by David Man
August 28, 29; 8:00 p.m.

In this comic, compelling one-man show, David recreates his trials and tribulations as a young, somewhat Lutheran theatre teacher in a Catholic high school. Revelations of Mann will appeal to audiences who are still in high school as well as to those who graduated long ago!

Visit the John Hassler Theater online for schedules and tickets: www.jonhasslertheater.org
Phone the Jon Hassler Theater at 507-534-2900.

August Community Theater Calendar

Brigadoon

August 5-8
Wit's End Theatre
Directed by Joe Chase, featuring bagpipe music by the Rochester Caledonia Pipe Band
Potter Auditorium
Chatfield, Minnesota
Advance ticket sales: Skippy's supermarket, (507) 867-4272
Tickets will be available at the door each performance.
www.sempan.com


Rock Solid Youth Center's production of Once Upon a Mattress. Photo by KC Saxon

Once Upon a mattress

August 6 - 9
Rock Solid Youth Center
Directed by Mark Roeckers; Music Directed by Sue Degallier, Produced by Patrick Marek.
rock Solid youth Center
75 W. 3rd Street
Winona, Minnesota

The Fantastics

August 6 - 16
Words Players--Alumni/College Age Production
Rochester Repertory Theatre
103 7th St. NE
Rochester, Minnesota
http://www.northlandwords.org


The Merlin Players' presentation of Anne of Green Gables. From left, Mackenzie Greiner, Gregory Somers and Jordyn Trnka. Photo by Edward Brown.

Annie of Green Gables

August 7 - 9; 13 - 15
The Merlin Players
Fairbault Paradise Center for the Arts
321 Central Ave
Faribault, Minnesota
Tickets: 507-332-7372
www.merlinplayers.org

How to Talk Minnesotan

August 12 - 15, 7:00 p.m.
Brave Community Theater
Spring Valley Community Center
Spring Valley, Minnesota
Spring Valley Ag Days Schedule

Saturday, July 25, 2009

BOOM! An International Lost and Found Family Marching Band


The Boom! family. Carla Noack, second from right.

(from Lanesboro Arts Council)
Tuesday, July 28, 7:30 p.m.
St. Mane Theatre, Lanesboro

Straight from a hit run of this year’s KC Fringe Festival, the Kansas City theatrical band is playing one night in Lanesboro, MN to share their sad, sad story. Created and directed by UMKC professor Stephanie Roberts the ensemble features Daniel Eichenbaum, Peter Lawless, Grant Prewitt, Heidi Van, Roberts, and Lanesboro’s own Carla Noack.

Boom! is the story of reunited orphans from around the world. Misplaced by their traveling scientist parents, these wayward foundlings magically converged in the heartland where they now seek meaning and healing through mysterious marches and geometrical formations. Come see what Robert Trussell of the Kansas City Star calls, “Joyful, foolish and crazed…agreeably ridiculous!

More about Boom!: www.myspace.com/boominternational
$10 tickets available at the door (doors open at 6:30)

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Hamlet

Great River Shakespeare Festival

by William Shakespeare, directed by Rick Barbour
Great River Shakespeare Festival Intern and Apprentice Acting Company (July 22, 2009)

The GRSF production of Hamlet provides a good reminder of what a great play Hamlet is. It’s also a good reminder of how well the entire GRSF company delivers Shakespeare’s texts. WSU’s black box theater exposes the actors on three sides of the stage—just feet away from the audience. There is little in the way of set pieces to hide behind, minimal lighting, minimal costuming, few props, and no exits. In fact, all the actors are on stage for the entire production. In this setting, the success of the play rests on the actors willingness to trust Shakespeare’s text and their ability to make Shakespeare’s language resonate.

Perhaps it is the language that is the strongest part of the apprentice production. Like all of the GRSF productions, these young actors are able to deliver Shakespeare’s lines with a precision and a cadence that is quite beautiful. Even during times when my mind may have wandered from the meaning of the words, I found myself enjoying the sound and the flow of the words—the company has achieved a certain musicality. And while it is easy to take the language for granted—it is Shakespeare after all, and these actors make it sound natural—the musicality must be the result of dedicated work with the text.

In an unusual choice, this production splits the role of Hamlet between four actors. While director Rick Barbour indicated that the decision to break up the role was largely a matter of sharing the work load and making sure that all the acting apprentices had significant roles to work on, the four-person Hamlet actually seemed quite natural. The four, JJ Gatesman, Kate Kremer, Dylan Roberts and Sarah Naughton, hold a certain unity in the role, even as each actor inevitably brings a unique personality to the person of Hamlet. I expected to be distracted by the changing, but like the rest of the play, it simply works, and different actors helped fill out the character. Hamlet is a very complicated and conflicted character—the different actors provided a subtle way to explore this complexity.

The acting in this production is strong from the major roles all the way down to minor characters. In the sixth year of the festival, Winona’s growing theater audience may take it for granted that all of the roles in a play will be played by very good actors. But this isn’t always the case in theater, and especially with Shakespeare’s plays, which tend to have large casts, most productions suffer a drop off in talent in the smaller roles. But because this cast is very talented, even the smaller characters maintain a high level of delivery. For example, Nicholas Munoz plays a powerful Fortinbras, worthy of a conquering general and future king of Denmark. Because Fortinbras’ entrance comes in the final scene of the play as most of the major characters lie dead on the stage, there often is not a powerful actor left to play him. (Munoz and nearly all of the other actors play two or more roles to cover the many and varied persons who appear on stage.)

In keeping with the black box nature of the play, the scenes are created by the actors on stage. Hamlet presents many challenges for settings, and the Intern and Apprentice company use simple and creative methods of meeting these challenges. From the night watch scenes to shipside and the graveyard, the company rises to the challenge of creating enough of an illusion of a space to move the story along. Much of this space and mood is established by on-stage vocalizations and simple instrumentation. This is particularly effective in the scenes where Hamlet’s ghost appears, but these types of sound effects are used effectively throughout the production. Additionally, Stephanie Lambourn’s musical adaptations and enacting of Ophelia’s “mad” songs are effectively disturbing and moving.

The Intern and Apprentice Acting Company’s production allows its audience to experience Hamlet in a way that really lets Hamlet shine. It is also a very good showcase of some young actors who are able to rise to the demands of one of the world’s great plays.

The GRSF Intern and Apprentice Acting Company’s production of Hamlet has three more performances:
Thursday, July 23, 3:00 p.m.
Friday, July 24, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, July 25, 3:00 p.m.

Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Community Theater Calendar

Suessical the Musical

July 23 - 25
Words Players -Senior Troupe
Century High School, Rochester,
www.northlandwords.org/wordsplayers

Annie Jr.

July 30 - August 1
Ye Olde Opera House Youth Show
Directed by Bethany Tisthammer
Spring Grove, MN
www.yeoldeoperahouse.org

Guys and Dolls

July 29 - August 2
Fountain City River Players
Fountain City Auditorium
42, North Main Street
Fountain City, Wisconsin.

The Fantastics in Lanesboro

July 30 - 31
Words Players--Alumni/College Age Production
St. Mane Theater
106 Parkway Ave. S
Lanesboro, MN
www.northlandwords.org

The Fantastics in Rochester

August 6 - 16
Words Players--Alumni/College Age Production
Rochester Repertory Theatre
103 7th St. NE
Rochester, MN
www.northlandwords.org

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The Tempest

Great River Shakespeare Festival

by William Shakespeare, directed by Alec Wild
Great River Shakespeare Festival (July 8, 2009)

The Tempest has traditionally been a hard play to categorize. It is often placed with a grouping of plays that are unsatisfyingly called romances. Included in this group are The Winter’s Tale, Pericles, and Cymbelin, which have all been produced by GRSF in the past years. Yet what can make these plays feel unsettling cannot be attributed entirely to their failure to follow structural expectations about comedy or tragedy. The romances ask an audience to suspend reality—using heavy doses of magic to move the plot. The Endings are often happy, if one can be satisfied with delayed happiness or too many lost years. And romances tend not to make a clear delineation between good and evil—evil often goes unpunished and characters are allowed to evolve and repent of their misdeeds. In contrast, in plays like Macbeth and Richard III, the protagonists are driven to evil by a lust for power. The audience can admire the plotting and action for their sheer audacity, yet the audience also understands that these men have reached too far and will get what they deserve.

The Tempest is surrounded by evil with the inclusion of a brother usurping a brother for a dukedom, a brother plotting against another brother for the crown, a plot for revenge, and the presence of witches, spirits, monsters, and magic. And yet, the audience doesn’t enjoy the clear satisfaction of knowing what or who is evil or of being assured that the evil characters will not prevail.

The Tempest GRSF
Michael Fitzpatrick as Stephano(eft) and Doug Scholz-Carlson as Tinculo in the Great River Shakespere Festival’s The Tempest.

Orchestrating the action of The Tempest stands Jonathan Gillard Daly as Prospero. Since being shipwrecked on the island 12 years earlier, Prospero has ruled the Island with an iron hand. He has enslaved the only inhabitant of the island as well as the spirits and nymphs who play and make music there. Through magic and diligence, Prospero controls time and circumstance. Daly’s role as Prospero is reminiscent of his powerful portrayal of Richard III in the GRSF’s second year. Like Richard, Prospero seems to relish the power inherent in manipulating people and events. Yet Daly’s Richard made the audience a conspirator in his clearly evil plot. While Daly’s Prospero makes similar confederacy with the audience, his motives and plans are more complex and harder for the audience to understand.

For example, Daly is not only the absolute ruler of the island, he is also the lone parent of the 15-year-old Miranda. And in the second scene where Prospero reveals to Miranda her birth identity, one wonders about his motives. Why has he waited all these years to tell her? Why does he check to see that she has little memory of Milan before telling his story? Why does he use magic to put her to sleep before finishing his tale? Is his affection for his daughter feigned like the affection Richard shows Lady Anne in Richard III? Does he love her, or is she just one more pawn to move in his complex plot?

The play begins under the spell of a tempest that Prospero has conjured to waylay the passing ship containing both King of Naples and Prospero’s brother. The shadow projection of the storm and the waves is both effective and delightful. The storm as well as the unlikely rescue from the storm are carried out by the island’s nymphs and spirits who are in Prospero’s service. These nymphs and spirits add a haunting feel to the play as they are always present, usually propped expressionless in the shadows of the set platforms wearing colorless body suits. Like Prospero, the nymphs and spirits seem menacing, yet they aren’t exactly evil. They are led by the spirit Ariel who is played by Tarah Flanagan. Flanagan presides over Prospero’s scheme as she flies over the island observing and intervening as necessary. On this set, Flanagan, with white hair flaming from her head, flies on the top of a tower near the center of the stage, even remaining aloft during intermission. While she is clearly in Prospero’s service—she is anxious to gain her promised freedom—there is a close bond between the man and spirit. Yet one wonders the same about Prospero’s feelings toward Areal as toward Miranda: does he really love this spirit, or is Areiel just one more pawn in his plans?

The set itself is made of cold metal and is usually darkly lit and inhabited by nymphs. The set platforms leave their steel trusses exposed and move on a cold steel rail. Even the island’s trees and plants are represented by metal pipes, which also serve as weapons. While this island is more like a prison to Prospero than a vacation resort, it seems a bit odd that an enchanted Mediterranean island, which has sustained Prospero and his daughter for 12 years, is presented as a cold, prison-like environment. The environment is a purposeful decision; the production clearly doesn’t want the audience to see the island as an appealing, pastoral setting.

One area where the island is allowed to lose its cool edge (while still maintaining its mysticism) is with music. Shakespeare has the spirits providing unexpected and often joyful music that both amazes and pleases the recently shipwrecked wanderers of the island. Composer Daniel Kallman brings these songs to life with a musical compositions that go beyond setting songs to music. The actors double as orchestra playing a wide variety of instruments, including rain drum, flute, viola, and hand bells. The music so perfectly fits the play that one easily forgets that it is not simply part of the air—even with the actors playing and singing on stage or in the semi-darkened upstage area. The music creates the storm, accompanies the singers, and helps to create the magic of the island.

Special note must be made of Caliban who often serves as a lightning rod for heated discussion about the play. Christopher Gerson answers the question of whether or not Caliban is human or monster with an almost unequivocal “monster” portrayal. Yet what is truly remarkable is that he convinces the audience that he is not human without use of any sort of monster costume (in fact, he is naked to the waist and wears no wig or mask). He seems unable to walk on two legs, seems to be in great pain when he speaks, and displays some unusually double jointed shoulder blades. And while the audience is likely to feel some sympathy for him, the slight deformities displayed by Gerson are enough evidence for Prospero, the new visitors to the island, and the audience that he is not human. Perhaps this is a good indication of how little deviation from the norm people are willing to allow before disavowing someone else’s humanity.

Sharing the stage with Caliban for much of the play is the jester, Doug Scholz-Carlson, and the drunk butler, Michael Fitzpatrick. Scholz-Carlson and Fitzpatrick display much of the same delightful impertinent playfulness that they showed in nearly identical roles in Twelfth Night in 2006 as the clown Feste, and Sir Toby Belch. Equally funny, but on the other end of the spectrum, Nicole Rodenburg plays Miranda with a devotion to her father and a winning innocence that matches Nick Demeris’s sudden and delirious devotion to her (despite the fact that he has just lost his father to the storm, he doesn’t know where he is, and Miranda’s father seems a bit mad.)

In his romances, Shakespeare asks his audience to be satisfied that happiness delayed—sometimes years later—is still worth while, that people can learn from the mistakes of their past, and that people can, after a time, forgive. But these requests are hard for an audience expecting a more timely revenge or repayment. The questions of who is good and who is evil still linger unanswered, and the play ends on the melancholy side of happiness. Even Prospero must remain on stage to ask the audience to be satisfied with the story and the ending, in short, to be satisfied with the fine acting, the powerful music, and the spectacular production. It’s not hard to follow Prospero’s injunction to “release me from my bands/ with the help of your good hands” and applaud at the conclusion of The Tempest (Epilogue 9 - 10). But long after leaving the theater, I’m still applauding the production for telling such a compelling story.

The Tempest plays in repertory with Love’s Labour’s Lost through July 26.

Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Minnesota Theatre Preview of Love's Labour's Lost

Sunday, July 12, 2009

More Summer Musicals

This week, two well-established Southeast Minnesota community theater troupes present their summer musicals. With companies marking 29 and 30 years, Rushford area Society of the Arts will stage Honk!, and Ye Olde Opra House will offer Lucky Stiff.

Lucky Stiff

Lucky Stiff poster

Presented by Ye Olde Opera House
Book by Lynn Ahrens, music by Stephen Flaherty, Lyrics by Lynn Ahrens.
Directed by Scott Solberg.

Lucky Stiff marks the 30th outdoor musical for Ye Olde Opera House, which presents an ambitious annual season of community theater in Spring Grove, Minnesota. Lucky Stiff is presented at “Ye Olde Gray Barn” just east of Spring Grove, and it includes an optional pre-show dinner under the stars. (Dinner served 6:30; performance; at 8:30)

July 15 - 19, 8:30 p.m.
Ye Olde Grey Barn, Spring Grove, Minnesota

For ticket and other information visit www.yeoldeoperahouse.org

Honk!

Honk! graphic

Presented by the Rushford Area Society of the Arts (RASA)
music by George Styles, Book and Lyrics by Anthny Drewe

RASA has been producing theater and other activities in Rushford, Minnesota for 29 years, with the annual summer musical emerging as one of the area's strongest community theater productions. Tickets generally go fast.

July 15, 16, and 17 at 7:00 PM
July 18 and 19 at 2:00 PM
Rushford-Peterson High School Theater, Rushford,Minnesota

Tickets on sale at Rushford Foods
More info at (507)251-9599

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Love’s Labour’s Lost

By William Shakespeare, directed by Paul Barnes
Great River Shakespeare Festival (July 7, 2009)

Great River Shakespeare Festival

In many ways, Love’s Labour’s Lost may be a risky play for Great River Shakespeare Festival to take on. Shakespeare’s verbal gymnastics must hold the audience because there is little in the way of action or plot. Small, familiar plot devices serve merely as diversions: mixed up letters, love sonnets that fall into the wrong hands, a party where the revelers are masked, for example. But this production stands strongly on its verse, and Shakespeare’s verbal power and this company’s skill and charisma rise to the occasion and make Love’s Labour’s Lost a rousing success.

Love's Labour's Lost
Chris Mixon (top) as Berowne and Andrew Carlson as Longaville in the GRSF production of Love’s Labour’s Lost

Love’s Labour’s Lost could be a Shakespeare skeptic’s worst nightmare: a play with seemingly endless Shakespearian speeches: no murders, no fights, no plotting for power, no forbidden love. And yet even a skeptic could quickly be drawn into the language of this production. Nearly all the dialog is in verse, and while the audience isn’t likely to recognize the sonnets and other poetry forms as they fly by, the incessant rhymes serve as constant reminders that the speeches and word play are largely constructions that allow the speakers to admire their own voices and their own wit. The sonneteers labor at their love with pen and tongue, yet they are more in love with themselves and their words than with the supposed objects of their affection.

At first blush, the GRSF staging of Love’s Labour’s Lost suggests the play will be a romp in the park. A lush green grass covers the center circle of the stage, and a simulated tree with pastel colored parasols for branches provides a fanciful pastoral setting. (And in bit of even more fancy, the parasols open early in the play and later close when the pastoral sporting must be set aside).

But while the King of Navarre and his court do their best to maintain their mirth and lover’s play, the seriousness of death surrounds the play. The bare, cold staging that surrounds the green of Navarre’s garden reminds the audience of the limits of play. The persistence of death is further reinforced by an interesting portrayal of the ill King of France personally handing his daughter the papers that she is to deliver to Navarre. This exchange happens quickly, in a pantomime that takes place as part of a sequence of song and character introductions before Shakespeare’s dialog begins. (The King of France never appears in Shakespeare’s play, yet the announcement of his death near the end serves as a critical turning point and a reminder of Navarre’s desire to defeat death by achieving fame in this life.)

Doug Scholz-Carlson as the King of Navarre tries to summon a seriousness that will meet death’s presence head on. Yet there is nothing about Scholz-Carlson and his followers that suggest seriousness—despite their serious oaths. They are dressed for sport in bright colors (in what seems to me to be a sort of 1900s country club look) even as they vow to three year’s study, fasting, and celibacy. Before the ink is dry on their vows, the men are bored and ready for diversions.

The diversion comes in two forms. The first diversion is the blundering verbosity of Christopher Gerson as the visiting Spaniard, Don Adriano de Armado. Gerson’s Spanish persona—complete with musketeer costume, sword and wig—does not disappoint. The other diversion comes by way of the Princess of France, Tara Flanagan, and her three attendants. Quickly, the King and his three men abandon their oaths and begin composing love sonnets in secret.

Chris Mixon as Berowne, one of the King’s men, does a wonderful job as perhaps the most verbal character in the play. His early speech explaining why it is unnatural to join the King’s school of fasting and celibacy temporarily alienates him from the King, but allys him to audience. He quickly appeases the King and agrees to sign with another poetical flourish punctuated with another rhyming couplet: “Give me paper, let me read the same, / And to the strictest decrees I’ll write my name” (I.i. 116-117).

While Mixon and the other men are serious about their sonneteering, Rosaline (Shanara Gabrielle) recognizes that these earnest men are not serious. Reprimanding Berowne, she tells him, “A jest’s prosperity lies in the ear / Of him that hears it, never in the tongue / Of him that makes it” (V.ii. 861-863) For once in the play, Berowne is humbled and speechless. Berowne and the rest have clearly been jesting for their own amusement and making love oaths for the love of the sound of them.

And the same could be said for Shakespeare, since the incessant word play is his. This production of Love’s Labour’s Lost consorts with its audience to enjoy the irony inherent in Shakespeare’s overly verbose warning of the dangers of poetry and speechifying.

Love’s Labour’s Lost plays in repertory with The Tempest through July 26.

Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Monday, July 6, 2009

GRSF Extra: The Daly News

Great River Shakespeare Festival

Great River Shakespeare Festival actor Jonathan Gillard Daly, known to GRSF audiences for his work as Shylock in The Merchant of Venice, Malvolio in Twelfth Night, Bottom in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and the title role in Richard III, among many others, will bring his play with music, The Daly News, to Winona for a special performance on Monday, July 13. All proceeds will benefit GRSF. This season Daly plays Prospero in The Tempest and Holofernes in Love’s Labour’s Lost. Gregg Coffin, composer of Love’s Labour’s Lost as well as 2005’s production of Much Ado About Nothing, collaborated on the music for The Daly News with Daly and Santa Maria, CA composer, Larry Delinger.

The Daly News

The Daly News tells the story of Martin Daly, Gillard Daly’s grandfather, who was a well-known Milwaukee banker. To keep his four sons connected to the family while they were serving in the military in World War II, Martin retired to the basement of the family home in Milwaukee each week where he edited and published a newsletter he called The Daly News. From 1943 to 1946, Martin mailed his weekly compilation of Milwaukee news and excerpts from his sons’ letters home to friends and other members of the family. Gillard Daly came across the newsletters years later and set to work turning them into a theatre piece, which was first performed at PCPA Theaterfest in California and later refined and adapted for production in the his family’s hometown, Milwaukee, WI.

July 13, 7:00 p.m. The Daly News: book and lyrics by Jonathan Gillard Daly, music by Gregg Coffin, Larry Delinger and Daly.

GRSF Apprentice and Intern Company: Hamlet

Another production to put on your calendar is the annual Apprentice and Intern production of Hamlet. The Apprentice and Intern Company play has been a popular ticket since its single performance in year one of the festival. In 2009, its production has expanded to five shows. The play is staged in WSU’s blackbox theater during the festival’s final week.

Hamlet

Tuesday, July 21, 7:30 p.m.
Wednesday, July 22, 7:30 p.m.
Thursday, July 23, 3:00 p.m.
Friday, July 24, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, July 25, 3:00 p.m.

Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Dear James

John Hassler Theater

Adapted by Sally Childs from the Novel by Jon Hassler; directed by Sally Childs.
John Hassler Theater (June 25, 2009)

The subject matter of Dear James is a bit unusual for drama: the thoughts and desires of a retired small town teacher and a retired Catholic priest. But this type of drama may have been just what the Jon Hassler had in mind when the collaboration between Sally Child’s Lyric Theater and the town of Plainview began 10 years ago. Bringing to life rich and full characters from small town Minnesota was the mark of Hassler’s fiction; the challenge for a Hassler staging is to place the complex web of relationships and generations and time into two hours on a single stage. In many ways this staging of Dear James does an extraordinary job of reducing the novel to its most important relationships: Agatha McGee’s relationship with a Catholic priest and her relationship to Staggerford, Minnesota, the town populated almost entirely by her former students or classmates.

Agatha, played by Cheryl Frarck, has found a kindred spirit in the way of a pen pal from Ireland named James. The exchange of letters between the two has forged a relationship, perhaps the most important relationship in either of the characters’ long lives. The similarities of their lives in somewhat insular, small-town Catholic communities helps to create the bond; but it is the limitations that each feels within their home life that makes the letter exchanges so important. The relationship is at a stand still at the opening of the play because Agatha unexpectedly traveled to Ireland to meet her pen pal only to discover that he is a priest. Robert Gardner’s soft brogue and gentle manner as the Irish priest are winning to both Agatha and the audience. His reason for failing to mention his vocation to Agatha is both understandable and completely inadequate. He says he never expected to meet her in person because he simply isn’t used to people picking up and traveling all over the world.

Time takes care of this withholding of information, which is one of the problems with this central relationship of the play. There is the potential for conflict over this betrayal and the potential for inner conflict over crossing the taboos of a relationship between a woman and a priest. There is also the potential for a public scandal in each of the small towns where private lives are hard to keep private. Even some of the advertising for the play suggest that this potential scandal along with Agatha’s anguish over being a companion to a priest will be central. But the play doesn’t really deal with these issues. Agatha and James meet in Rome and re-start the relationship. Later, James has an uneventful visit to Staggerford. There are no conflicts, no scandals, no personal anguish, and no drama.

The real conflict of the play is between Agatha and the town. One of Agatha’s former students, played deliciously by the scheming Coralee Grebe, finds James’ letters to Agatha which exhibit Agatha’s attitudes and opinions of the town and the townspeople. Grebe’s character broadcasts the contents of these letters, and when Agatha returns from her pilgrimage to Rome, she is met with a cold shoulder by the townspeople who feel betrayed by one of their most upstanding citizens.

The only satisfying confrontation is a delightful phone conversation between Frarck and Grebe where Frarck confronts her former student, and Grebe responds with the bold, faked innocence that she likely perfected as a student in Stagggerford’s schools. While the lack of direct conflict may disappoint a theater audience, perhaps this is the way it is, both inside and outside of a small town: problems aren’t resolved by direct conflict but by the passing of time and the placing of recent hurts and betrayals into a long perspective that life lived in one place provides. The audience is asked to accept that the town and Agatha have forgiven each other. But I’m not convinced; the long perspective can just as easily mean a long memory over a perceived wrong.

The acting in the play is very strong. I especially enjoyed Eric Knutson’s portrayal of the child-like Vietnam vet French, who, even as one of the town’s eccentrics, stands in as a representative of Staggerford. He wants to please, is easily distracted from what is important, yet is unwilling to be pushed into to doing something that he doesn’t want to do. The single set stage does a nice job of creating the different spaces where action happens. I found the screen and lighting that creates James’ study in Ireland particularly effective.

Dear James plays at the Jon Hassler Theater through July 12.

Visit the John Hassler Theater online for schedules and tickets: www.jonhasslertheater.org
Phone the Jon Hassler Theater at 507-534-2900.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Shakespeare Preview: Love’s Labour’s Lost

Great River Shakespeare Festival

A comedy that shares much with A Midsummer Nights Dream, Love’s Labour’s Lost begins with a group of men worried about the short span of their lives. Determined to offset an individual’s ephemeral presence on the earth, King Ferdinand decides that the way to immortality is through significant achievement that will warrant remembrance in ages to come. His strategy for achievement is a curious one: his court will become a temporary hermitage where study and fasting will gain him the fame he seeks. Ferdinand is sure in his strategy:

Our late edict shall strongly stand in force:
Navarre shall be the wonder of the world;
Our court shall be a little academe,
Still and contemplative in living art. I.i.12-14

As part of this edict, women will not be allowed near the court (with punishment worse for the woman who comes within a mile of court than the man who consorts with a woman). But even as the three lords attending the King swear to abide by the three-year’s fasting and study, the King is reminded of the expected arrival of the King of France’s daughter on a matter of serious state business.

Predictably, the Princess arrives with three attending ladies (nicely matching up with the three fasting lords) and ultimately exposing the academe as the silly bit of hubris that it is.

Aside from the matched lords and ladies, Shakespeare populates the play with a number of stock characters and situations for amusements, distractions, and merriment: a clown, a country wench, a conceited foreign fantastic, a play within a play performed by local rustics, and extensive word play.

But Shakespeare pulls back from providing the comedy that seems inevitable from the opening scene and uses the entrance of the women to shine a bit of reality on hasty oaths and the intrusion of death to re-examine insincere attempt at immortality. Instead of the ending the King and his men desire, Shakespeare provides the ending that they, and perhaps we, need.

Love’s Labour’s Lost plays in repetory with The Tempest through July 26.
Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Monday, June 29, 2009

Shakespeare Preview: The Tempest

Great River Shakespeare Festival

As the Great River Shakespeare Festival points out in an article printed in the program (and included on its website), Shakespeare generally provides just about all of the relevant information required to enjoy the play in the opening scenes. This is certainly true in the Tempest’s opening scenes. But much of this information comes in a lengthy monologue given by Prospero to his daughter—a monologue that even Prospero senses could prove challenging to follow. Another challenge for the audience is keeping track of the large number of characters who enter the stage (and the previously sparsely populated island.) Having a general idea of who the characters are and how they are related to each other could be helpful. (The GRSF program lists the characters alphabetically by cast members last name. This practice is more egalitarian than the traditional hierarchy in a Shakespearean cast of characters: male royalty in order of title—king, dukes, then lords—the rest of the men, female royalty, the rest of the females. But the alphabetical list provides little help in grouping together characters on stage in any meaningful way.)

Following are groupings of the characters as they appear in the play:

Island Inhabitants

Prospero (Jonathan Gillard Daley) and Ariel (Tara Flanagan) in the Great River Shakespeare Festival production of The Tempest.

Prospero (former Duke of Milan)
Miranda (Prospero’s teenaged daughter)
Caliban (An island native, slave to Prospero)
Ariel (an “airy spirit”)
Other spirits/nymphs

Prospero and Miranda took shelter on this tropical Island after a shipwreck, 12 years before the action of the play. Prospero had been the Duke of Milan, but was forced out by his brother (Antonio) with help from the King of Naples (Alonso). Prospero became “lord” of the island by freeing the spirit Ariel who had been imprisoned by a sorceress’s spell. The sorceress, Sycorax, had died before Prospero and Miranda arrived. Sycorax left a son, Caliban.

Survivors of Shipwreck—group 1

Ferdinand

The survivors of the shipwreck are separated during the wreck and come to the island believing that they are the only survivors. Ferdinand is the son of the King of Naples and is instantly attracted to Miranda (who is attracted to him as well).

Survivors of Shipwreck—group 2

Alonso (King of Naples)
Sebastion (the King’s brother)
Antonio (Prospero’s brother, now Duke of Milan)
Gonzalo (and old counselor to Antonio-had been counselor to Prospero)
Adrian (lord from Naples)
Francisco (lord from Naples)

The royalty wander the island believing that they are the only survivors from the ship and the only humans on the island. These royals were sailing home from the marriage of the King’s daughter to the King of Tunis. Now the king believes his son, and heir to the thrown, has drowned. Conveniently, all of Prospero’s enemies have landed on his island.

Survivors of Shipwreck—group 3

Trinculo (a jester)
Stephano (a drunken butler)

These two characters do little to further the plot of the play, yet they provide much in the way of Shakespearean humor. Besides, someone has to keep tabs on the ship’s stock of wine.

The Tempest and Colonialism

The Great River Shakespeare Festival’s production of the Tempest doesn’t deal with issues of slavery and colonialism according to the article in the program: “Some people hold that these [Colonialism and slavery] are the themes inherent in Shakespeare’s play; we don’t, but even if they were, you wouldn’t need to know much about them to have a rich and satisfying experience in the theatre.” And while it is true that a colonial (or post colonial) perspective is not necessary for a fine production of the play, this play may be Shakespeare’s only connection with those of us living in the western hemisphere, so it may be worth exploring this connection a bit.

The Tempest was written late in Shakespeare’s career, with the earliest performance on record in 1611.1 By this time, English exploration by sea was well under way and the stories of interactions with native peoples were finding their way back to England. The Jamestown colony was established in 1607, and a 1609 shipwreck off the Bermuda Islands of a ship heading for Jamestown may form part of the story for The Tempest. Much of the crew survived the wreck, spent a year on an island in the Bermudas, re-built two ships, and made it to Jamestown.2 It is likely that Shakespeare read the published accounts of the voyage and its year-long adventure on the island, including a description of the island that seems echoed in the play: “country so abundantly fruitful of all fit necessaries for the sustenation and preservation of a man’s life.”3

In addition to the stories of islands, Shakespeare would have known about captured Native Americans displayed in Europe as savages. According to Historian Ronald Takaki, English explorers continued Columbus’s practice of kidnapping natives and bringing them to Europe for display. 4 This practice is even referenced in The Tempest. When Stephano first discovers Calaban on the island, he alludes to the possibility of bringing the islander to Italy for profit: “If I can recover him and keep him tame and get to Naples with him, he’s a present for any emperor that ever trod on neat’s leather.” II.ii.64-67

Earlier in the scene, Trinculo comes upon the hiding Calaban and refers to the practice of making money from displaying natives, even using the name Indian. “A strange fish! Were I in England now, as once I was, and had but this fish painted, not a holiday fool there but would give a piece of silver. There would this monster make a man. Any strange beast there makes a man. When they will not give a doit to relieve a lame beggar, they will lay out ten to see a dead Indian.” II.ii.27-32.

Because Caliban is most often grouped with the comic duo of Trinculo and Stephano, it’s unlikely that Shakespeare is making much of any type of political or social statement about the abuse of native peoples or the period of colonization that England is embarking on in the early 17th Century. But I do find it fascinating that a historical figure of Shakespeare’s stature, perhaps one of the greatest writers of English, was in some way a witness to the beginning of the clash between European and Native American culture—a clash that has betrayed our own national narrative of fairness and equality and a clash which continues to haunt the continent into the 21st Century.

While there is a connection to the new world of the Western Hemisphere, the Italian royals created by Shakespeare were not likely to travel this far west on their way back from Tunis. Instead the island is more likely located somewhere in the Mediterranean, and Shakespeare leaves Calaban’s ethnicity (and some might argue, humanity) ambiguous.

Notes
1Hallet Smith. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1997). 1656.
2Gerald Graff and James Phelan, editors. William Shakespeare. The Tempest: A Case Study in Critical Controversy. (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s. 2000) 116.
3Graff and Phelan, 117
4RonaldTakaki “The ‘Tempest’ in the Wilderness,” in Graf and Phelan, 148 - 149.

The Tempest plays in repetory with Love's Labour's Lost through July 26.
Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Great River Shakespeare Festival, Season 6

Great River Shakespeare Festival

Winona, Minnesota

The 6th season of the Great River Shakespeare Festival has begun with previews and openings of both plays, Love’s Labour’s Lost and The Tempest, occurring over the past weekend. Neither of these plays are on the list of “Shakespeare blockbusters,” if there were such a list, but they offer intriguing looks at Shakespeare early and late. Each play offers unique creative challenges for the actors, directors, and designers, but as with most Shakespeare, ample opportunity for physical comedy, romance, dramatic tension, clever wordplay, and theatrical spectacle.

In each of the preceding seasons, much local advertising has focused on the accessibility of GRSF’s presentations and the appeal of these plays to a broad cross section of Minnesotans, even to Joe the Plumbers. This seems to be the message again this year as the Festival markets two lesser known plays in a year where the festival has had to significantly cut its production budget. The message is summed up in an article posted on the GRSF website and printed inside the program that declares “You don’t need to know much in advance” to appreciate our productions. A version of this same article was e-mailed to patrons last week. As this article points out, Shakespeare generally provides much of the back story in the opening two scenes, and this back story is all an audience member needs to know.

Much Shakespeare is filled with jokes and references that most of us are not likely to catch—because they are dated, not because we’re not smart! (For example, the expression “hiking the Appalachian Trail” might be culturally witty this month, an interesting reference in a couple of years, but totally meaningless 10 years from now—let alone 400 years.) Scholars can often get to the bottom of dated references in Shakespeare, but the rest of us can simply enjoy what we do find humorous or poignant and not worry about what we might be missing.

Over the past 5 years, the Great River Shakespeare festival has demonstrated its ability and commitment to both remain faithful to the text and to make the plays alive and vibrant for a modern audience. Perhaps in the Festival’s first year I was cautious about urging everyone I knew to attend the play. I was pretty sure that I would enjoy the plays, but I was afraid others might find the plays too hard to follow, too stuffy, too wordy, or too long. But every GRSF production that I’ve seen has convinced me that Shakespeare is meant to be enjoyed by everyone.

The Tempest and Love’s Labour’s Lost play in repertory through July 26
Visit the Great River Shakespeare Festival for schedules and tickets: grsf.org

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The Rainmaker opens at the Commonweal

The Commonweal will fill out its summer repertory with Richard Nash’s The Rainmaker. The play had its first successful run on Broadway in 1954 with a more recent revival in 1999. It also has seen productions in Film (with Burt Lancaster and Katherine Hepburn), television, and as a musical titled 101 in the Shade. The Rainmaker at the Commonweal begins previews Friday, June 19.

The play takes place on a small ranch in the western U.S. during a drought summer. A father and his three adult children—two sons and a daughter—are trying to survive the drought and discover how much hope is allowed in a seemingly barren world. A major concern, voiced openly by the men, is the diminishing marital prospects for Lizzie who is already into her late 20s. But along with this specific concern, is the larger tension between pragmatism and yearning.

Into the balance (simplistically, two members fall out on the practical side, two on the dreamer side), comes Bill Starbuck, a self proclaimed Rainmaker who promises to bring back the rain and, predictably, disrupts the family’s equilibrium. While all of the men must adjust to the changing barometer, it is Lizzie who bears the brunt of the storm and must ultimately choose whether or not to accept the pragmatic role that she has been preparing herself for or risk the potential foolishness of hope.

The play itself has a lot of potential for a contemporary audience. The seeming conflict between practicality and personal fulfillment has not gone away since the 1950s, nor has the fear of being left alone—a spinster in the nomenclature of the play. Yet much has changed in the intervening 50 years. Most notably, all four family members would have more choices and more opportunities than they had in 1950, and a rainmaker could enter their lives in many ways other ways than walking through the front door. One of the challenges for the Commonweal will be to stay true to the play (which many in the audience are likely to know) without becoming stuck in an historical caricature that is easily dismissed.

The Rainmaker runs in repertory with the Odd Couple through October 24.

Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

HCO Production of Beauty and the Beast

Beauty and the Beast finale during dress rehersal

Over the more than 10 years that Winona’s Home and Community Options (HCO) has used a summer musical production as a fundraiser for its work providing residential services to people with developmental disabilities, they’ve developed a reputation for creating a huge theatrical splash. Even with the arrival of the Great River Shakespeare Festival and the Gilmore Creek Summer Theater, HCO has consistently wowed sell-out houses summer after summer. This summer, they’ve even added an additional show for a 7-night run—a long run for a community theater production. While much of the box office success can be attributed to the support HCO has in the Winona area, it is also a result of HCO’s commitment to producing a grand theater experience. In short, they have meet the demands of big musicals by stepping up with a big vision, year after year.

This year’s production of Beauty and the Beast is no different. HCO draws from a talented pool of community actors—some with extensive stage experience. The actors include adults to students from area high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools. Included in this mix are many residents of HCO’s area facilities, many of whom are now seasoned actors and stage hands. These actors are supported by a professional pit orchestra, ambitious chorography, spectacular costuming, a tremendous number of volunteers, and a staging that befits a professional house like St. Mary’s Page Theatre.

Beauty and the Beast

June 18 - 24, St. Mary’s University Page Theatre
Music by Alan Menken, lyrics by Howard Asman and Tim Rice, book by Linda Wolverton.
Directed by Bruce Ramsdell, musical direction by Harry Michell, costumes by Janice Turek, Choreography by Jennifer TeBeest, sets by Steve Libera, technical direction by Mitchell Auman.

Tickets available at the Page Theater Box office (507) 547-1715 or online at www.pagetheatre.org.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Hedda Gabler Closes Friday

Friday is the last chance to see perhaps the strongest play of the season: the Commonweal's Hedda Gabler.

Preview of the Commonweal’s Hedda Gabler
Review of the Commonweal’s Hedda Gabler

Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Dear James Opens Saturday at the Jon Hassler

John Hassler Theater

The Jon Hassler continues its tradition of staging adaptations of Jon Hassler novels with the opening of Dear James Saturday, Jun 13. This will be the third staging of Dear James in Plainview. The first came in 1997 when Minneapolis’s Lyric Theater staged the play in Plainview’s Catholic church. The Lyric’s involvement with Plainview would evolve into the Jon Hassler Theater.

The Jon Hassler Theater provides the following synopsis of Dear James:

Dear James focuses on the character whom author Jon Hassler admitted was closest to his heart, the upright Agatha McGee, who regularly sets her beloved hometown of Staggerford on its ear with her sawtoothed tongue. At age 70, retired, cut adrift from her moorings and depressed, she heads off to Rome, where her old pen pal, Father James O’Hannon, tracks her down after several years of unanswered letters and a life-threatening illness. Back home, French, her only living relative (who doesn’t know it) house-sits and is visited by Imogene, a lonely, loveless childhood friend whose agenda is seduction. While Agatha and James renew their friendship in Rome and Assisi, Imogene ferrets out James’ letters to Agatha and goes public with what was meant to be private, with disastrous results.

Corallee Grebe as Imogene and Eric Knutson as French in Jon Hassler’s Dear James. (Benjamin Hain Photo)
Read Käri Knutson’s story in the Winona Daily News.

Dear James by John Hassler, Directed by Sally Childs

Cheryl Frarck as Agatha McGee
Robert Gardner as Father James Gardner
Coralee Grebe as Imogene
Eric Knutson as French
Joe Ulwelling as Senator Myron Kleinschmidt


Dear James runs June 13 - July 24 (with a sneak preview June 12)

Visit the John Hassler Theater online for schedules and tickets: www.jonhasslertheater.org
Phone the Jon Hassler Theater at 507-534-2900.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Commonweal Opens The Odd Couple Saturday

Commonweal’s The Odd Couple
Eric Bunge (Felix) and Hall Cropp (Oscar) in the Commonweal’s production of The Odd Couple.

The Commonweal’s summer season opens Saturday (with the final preview performances tonight and Friday) with Neil Simon’s The Odd Couple. The Odd Couple was a huge stage success, opening on Broadway in 1965. It ran for 966 performances and won several Tony awards. Simon adapted it into a motion picture in 1969, and the story ran as a television series in the early 70s. Because the play has had these incarnations (plus many performances in professional and community theaters around the globe), most people are already familiar with the basic story: two recently divorced men try and pull their lives together without driving each other insane.

The play is an unlikely success since it starts at the wrong side of the happily-ever-after story that pervades comedy on stage, film, and television. But The Odd Couple is clearly a story that captured the attention of the American public, perhaps because it appeared as many Americans were trying to come to terms with the question of what happens when the 50s ideal of marriage and family doesn’t work out. Many Americans were looking for second chances, and ready and willing to risk laughing in the post happy-ever-after world.

The Commonweal production features its Artistic Director, Hal Cropp and Managing Director Eric Bunge in the lead roles of Oscar Madison and Felix Ungar.

The Odd Couple runs May 15 - October 23
Hedda Gabler runs April 16 - June 12
The Rainmaker runs June 19 - October 24

Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Read Terry Rindfleisch’s Winona Daily News Story about the Commonweal’s The Odd Couple.

Jon Hassler 10th Anniversary Season

John Hassler Theater

The Jon Hassler Theater marks 10 years of outstanding professional theatre in Plainview, Minnesota, boyhood home of Minnesota’s beloved novelist, Jon Hassler. To open a season-long 10th Anniversary Celebration, the Hassler comes full-circle with the return of Dear James, from the novel by Jon Hassler, adapted and directed by Sally Childs.

The Lyric Theater of Minneapolis, under the artistic direction of Sally Childs, brought stage adaptations of Hassler’s novels to Plainview beginning in 1997, when Dear James was presented at St. Joachim’s Catholic Church in front of a standing-room only crowd. Three years later, the Lyric Theater made the newly opened Jon Hassler Theater its permanent home, initiating the first season in 2000 with Grand Opening, followed by Simon’s Night in 2001.

“Ten years is a signal achievement for any non-profit enterprise, especially in view of the turbulent economy,” said Carter Martin, Jon Hassler Theater General Manager. “It’s definitely a milestone worth celebrating, and we could think of no finer vehicle than Dear James, the play that launched the Jon Hassler Theater.”

In its early years, the Theater focused on productions steeped in rural themes, including adaptations not only of Hassler’s novels but also of Boxelder Bug Variations by Bill Holm, Old Man Brunner Country, based on poems by Leo Dangel, and Bordertown Café, by Canadian playwright Kelly Rebar. As time went on, that vision expanded to include musicals in collaboration with Troupe America of Minneapolis, including How to Talk Minnesotan and Guys on Ice; challenging productions including Proof by David Auburn, Edward Albee’s Seascape, and The Pillowman by Martin McDonagh; high comedy as embodied in The Odd Couple by Neil Simon, Rounding Third by Richard Dresser, and Don’t Hug Me by Phil Olson; and Minnesota premieres including Honk! by Anthony Drew and George Stiles and Jacob Marley’s Christmas Carol by Tom Mula.

Throughout its first decade, care was taken that the Hassler regularly return to its rural roots. “Our lodestar has always been the world of the small-town,” says Martin. “No matter how far into the wider world we progress, we always remember where our home is.”

The 10th Anniversary Season:

Dear James, by Jon Hassler
June 13 - July 12

The Hassler Summer Sampler:

Boxelder Bug Variations, a Tribute to the Late Minnesota Author, Bill Holm
Saturday, August 8th, 8:00PM

What I Want to Be When I Grow Up! By David Harris
Saturday, August 22nd, 7:00PM

Revelations of Mann by David Mann
Saturday/Sunday, August 28th/29th, 8:00PM

Leaving Iowa, by Time Clue and spike Manton
September 18 - October 18

Don’t Hug Me Christmas Carol, by Phil Olson
November 5 - November 22

Visit the John Hassler Theater online for schedules and tickets: www.jonhasslertheater.org
Phone the Jon Hassler Theater at 507-534-2900.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Hedda Gabler

by Henrik Ibsen, Directed by Hal Cropp
Commonweal Theatre
April 14

Any production of Hedda Gabler revolves around the character of Hedda Gabler, who is actually Hedda Tesman after her recent marriage. I’m reminded of a comment by Jonathan Gillard Daly about his role as Richard in The Great River Shakespeare Festival’s production of Richard III. Daly realized that for the play to work, his character had to dominate every scene he was in; there could be no coasting, no letting other actors carry the energy. This is what we expect from our great hero/villains like Richard, Macbeth, or Lady Macbeth; it is part of what fascinates us about them. The Commonweal’s Adrienne Sweeny begins the play with this sort of dominance—she bursts onto the stage confident, agitated, and malicious. She insults her new Aunt, her new maid, and her new home with a calculated but seemingly unnecessary spitefulness. But ultimately, the circumstances of the play will prevent Hedda and Sweeney the opportunity of being the great villain; during the course of the play, Hedda is slowly crowded off of her own stage.

With Ibsen’s modernist approach to tragedy, Hedda’s fall from nobility began long before the play begins. At 29, her beauty and social stature are slipping away. That she has married below herself socially is reaffirmed again and again by the other character’s astonishment that she has married George Tesman. The refrain, even from Tesman himself, runs to variations of, “imagine, Hedda Gabler.” Hedda is the daughter of the great General Gabler, whose portrait hangs above the stage (and is lit between scenes, a bit too brightly, as a reminder of her former status). It’s also clear that the marriage is a step down financially. While George has prospects for an appointment at the University, Aunt Julie and Judge Parker both remark on the expense of maintaining a wife like Hedda Gabler. One can assume that her seemingly loveless marriage to George (who adores Hedda, in his detached, clueless manner) was a result of diminishing options for Hedda. Hedda’s fall is not simply a social one; she is losing control over her own life as indicated by the loss of control over her immediate surroundings.

In the Commonweal production, the Tesman drawing room is littered with crates containing Tesman’s research materials. As the play proceeds, more crates are placed on stage, literally and symbolically leaving little room for Hedda. Along with the physical space, the characters who inhabit the space further deflate Hedda by simply ignoring her meanness. Tesman’s Aunt Julie, played by Nancy Carruthers Huisenga, responds to Hedda’s slights with syrupy sweetness. Huisenga displays a slight bit of hurt after Hedda insults her prize hat, a hat she purchased especially to please Hedda, but very quickly moves beyond the insult. Later when Tesman assures Hedda that Aunt Julie has forgotten the incident, it isn’t simply a comforting gesture. Huisenga’s Aunt Julie really seems to have forgotten it, and in forgetting the insult, Hedda becomes even more invisible.

While Hedda has landed in a house that was purchased and furnished to her desires, the space is clearly not hers. Aunt Julie doesn’t live there, but her close relationship with Tesman, played by Scott Dixon, maintains her presence in the house. She is annoyingly selfless: along with giving her personal house keeper to the newlyweds, she has put up her pension to help Tesman secure this new house, she takes care of her invalid sister, and after her sister dies, she looks for another invalid to take care of. Dixon’s childish affection for his aunt (he calls her “Aunty Ju Ju” in this production) is completely genuine, and this relationship adds to the harmony in the house, a harmony that Hedda desperately attempts to disrupt. Dixon plays Tesman as a husband devoted to his new wife, without any expectations of her. He doesn’t expect her to love him, to care about his career, or to take interest in his dying Aunt Rina. He is delighted to be married to Hedda, but beyond that, he is too happy with his own world to take much notice of her. There is no place for a heroic villain in this sea of contented, selfless, bland love.

Dixon, in his brilliant portrayal of the hapless academic Tesman, has a way of ending sentences with an irritating drawn out “hmm” to punctuate his vapid convictions. He wants nothing other than the kind of love he has with his aunt, and his only hint of disapproval of Hedda comes when he asks if she couldn’t try and call his aunt “Aunty Ju Ju” instead of “Miss Tesman,” or when he asks her to visit the deathbed of Aunty Rina. He accepts refusals on both accounts without much sign of disappointment. Later, Tesman is overjoyed when Hedda (mistakenly) reveals a small amount of concern for his position at the university and actually calls him George for the first time. Hedda mockingly responds to Tesman’s euphoria by suggesting that he run and tell Aunty Ju Ju the good news. Tesman misses the insult and assures her that he will do just that. Dixon/Tesman’s inability to be wounded by Hedda makes her malice harmless, and in a sense, it further helps her disappear.

Perhaps it isn’t fair to paint Ibsen’s tragedy in terms of late 20th Century notions of identity politics, as I am certainly doing. And it would be going too far to say that Hedda is simply a victim of her environment and the confining role of women in late 19th Century society. But I think the Commonweal is right to highlight a desperation in Hedda, to underscore that this woman of power and substance has been squeezed into an insipid life with dwindling prospects of being an actor in her own life’s drama. And yet, Sweeney’s Hedda is much more complex than a hapless victim of diminishing options and oppressive circumstances. For all of her outward bravado, at pivotal moments in her life, she has stopped short of the kind of bold action that her forceful persona suggests she would take without hesitation.

Her forceful action during the play is limited to appropriations of the undertakings of the two visitors who operate on a different credo than the insipid one that pervades the Tesman home. The first of those characters is the unhappily married Thea, a timid woman who had been tormented by Hedda when they were school girls. Yet Thea, unlike Hedda, is able to take action despite her outward persona and lower social position. Thea certainly experiences the same societal limitations confronting Hedda, but Thea is able to take steps that Hedda herself would not likely ever risk. The other character is Eilert Lovborg whose last contact with Hedda involved looking at the wrong end of a dueling pistol. While Lovborg seems an unlikely hero for Hedda to attach her hopes to, she does exactly that, pinning her ultimate salvation on his ability to rise above and beyond his personal demons.

The character of Hedda Gabler is missing a couple other characteristics that might allow an audience to identify with a hero/villain. Richard in Richard III, for example, begins the play telling the audience exactly what he is going to do and why. The audience becomes both observer and conspirator in the progression of actions that Richard takes to achieve his goals. But with Hedda, the audience isn’t a conspirator; it doesn’t even understand what Hedda wants. She articulates her motivation in terms of an idealized heroic beauty. Unlike Richard’s clear and tangible goals, Hedda’s is ephemeral and skewed by her father’s understanding of military valor, her inflated sense of entitlement, and her current state of desperation and powerlessness. In short, the audience can’t see where her villainy might lead. The result is a character who is complex, realistic, and far to much like us for us to be comfortable with.


Before I saw the premiere of Hedda Gabler, I had the pleasure of listening to Ibsen Scholar Joan Templeton’s talk “Hedda Gabler, Hedda Gabler: Who Is She?” as part of the Commonweal’s 12th annual Ibsen Festival. Early in her presentation, Templeton offered a sampling from a long line of criticism on the character of Hedda, dating back to the premier performance in 1890. While a handful of reviewers saw in Hedda a strong woman, a complex human being, or a hero championing women’s rights, many reviewers saw Hedda as simply too evil to be allowed on the stage. While audiences are mesmerized by the calculated evil of other heroic villains, they have often felt revulsion for the character of Hedda. We laughed along with Templeton as she read the quotes from reviewers who obviously “didn’t get it,” who missed the oppression that Hedda faced and who clearly had outdated modes of a woman’s role in the home and in society. I think we were laughing with the secure knowledge that from our own enlightened vantage point in 2009, we would be able to see Hedda as the strong and complex character that Ibsen intended. However, after seeing the production, the nagging (and slightly embarrassing) question in my head seemed to match some of the less than enlightened reviewers: “Why does Hedda have to be so mean, especially to Aunty Ju Ju?”

Hedda Gabler plays through June 12
Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Friday, April 17, 2009

Shakespeare in the Park

Wenonah Players
(Drama club from Winona State University)

Wenonah Players annual tribute to/send up of Shakespeare with shorts from slect plays and related material. Shows Saturday and Sunday. Most years, the company parades from the PAC at Winona State to the Gazeebo, which means they are sometimes late. Sit close to better hear the dialog, but be warned, you might become a prop. Make sure to bow to the royalty and say Huzzah a lot.

April 18 & 19, 2 p.m.
at the Gazebo
Winona's Lake Park

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Hedda Gabler, Ibsen Fest in Lanesboro

Hedda Gabler Hedda Gabler (Adrienne Sweeney--Commonweal photo)

The kickoff to the 2009 professional theater seasons starts this weekend with the much anticipated Ibsen Festival at the Commonweal in Lanesboro, Minnesota. The festival features music, lectures, films, visual art, and of course, a full production of Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler at the Commonweal. Previews of the play run Thursday and Friday with a Saturday evening opening.

The title character of the play has recently married (much to everyone’s surprise) aspiring academic, George Tesman. As Hedda prepares to settle into the predictable role of wife to a capable, kind, but not exceptional, husband, she remains obsessed with the possibility that someone can live a life of courage and daring. More importantly, she feels the need to pull the strings that facilitate the rise of this heroic person. Perhaps as her own life moves toward the common, she needs to believe that the exceptional is still possible. Like so many of Ibsen’s characters fixated on an ideal, her obsession ripples through the other characters with predictable and unpredictable repercussions. Hedda (the character as well as the play) is a favorite among Ibsen characters for her charm, wit, and shear bravado.

Hedda Gabler runs through June 12
The 2009 Ibsen Festival runs Friday - Sunday, April 17 - 19
Visit the Commonweal for festival details: commonwealtheatre.org
Follow this link for an Ibsen Fest Schedule of Events (PDF file).

Friday, April 3, 2009

A Raisin in the Sun

by Lorraine Hansberry, directed by Lou Bellamy
Penumbra Theatre Production at the Guthrie Theatre
April 1, 2009

A year ago when I read that Penumbra and the Guthrie would be presenting Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, 50 years after its debut on Broadway, I mentally placed it on my “must see” list. I saw it as an opportunity to see a play that was a breakthrough for Hansberry and for African American writers, directors, and actors, a play that is often mentioned alongside other mid-century giants such as Death of a Salesman and The Glass Menagerie. In short, I was viewing the play as an important piece of American literary history, so I was caught off guard by the power of Penumbra’s staging.


Erika LaVonn (Ruth) and David Alan Anderson (Walter Lee) Photo by Peter Jennings (Penumbra)

I shouldn’t have been surprised. The work carries an electricity even in the reading, and I know from experience with Penumbra’s productions that what is electric on the page becomes almost unbearably real on stage. Even in the waking moments of the play, where members of the Younger family arrise in turn to take their turns in the shared bathroom (shared with other families, not just with other siblings), long held dreams were fading. The impatience evident in the terse derailed conversation between Ruth and Walter Lee let the audience know that this family is on the edge, and that this marriage and family could explode or, sadder yet, simply turn cold and bitter.

Set in post WWII Chicago, a three-generation family lives in a small two bedroom apartment. Lena Younger and her husband Walter moved to this apartment shortly after marrying and vowed that they would move to a real house in the coming years. More than thirty years later, with Big Walter dead, the Younger family still lives in the same apartment: Lena, her son Walter Lee and his wife Ruth and their 10-year-old son Travis, and Lena’s college-aged daughter Beneatha. Theirs is a story of a dream denied: Big Walter and Lena were never able to buy that house, and it still takes three adults working full-time menial jobs to cover the expenses of living in the run-down Southside apartment. Lena and Ruth hold on to the slim dream of moving to a house, a structure that could relieve the claustrophobic stress while holding their family together. Beneatha, whose exposure to ideas at college has kindled her dreams, sees new possibilities: self expression, identity, Africa, medical school. But Walter, 10 years her senior has seen his dreams fade, and on the morning the play opens, he is franticly trying not to miss a last opportunity for creating a better life.


A Raisin in the Sun’s 50 years of success with theater audiences, black and white, may stem from Hansberry’s ability to articulate a sense of accumulated loss and disappointment over missed dreams in a way that many people can identify with on some level. For example, Walter Lee’s impatient and single-minded obsession with his clearly doomed liquor store scheme is irrationally childish and dangerous to the family’s equilibrium. Yet when the deal goes awry and the family’s money is stolen, the audience’s anger at Walter is tempered by empathy because most people have either been that reckless obsessed child or loved a person with that recklessness. As a mark of a good play, it’s easy for the audience to see a part of itself on stage.


Adeoye (Joseph Asagai) and Bakesta King (Beneatha) Photo by Tim Fuller (Penumbra)

Yet, according to actor and playwright Ossie Davis, who replaced Sidney Poitier in the original Broadway production, this identification caused a problem for a play that set out to draw attention to the plight of black Americans at a specific time and place. Davis says, “One of the biggest selling points about Raisin. . .was how much the Younger family was just like any other American family. Some people were ecstatic to find that ‘it didn’t really have to be about Negroes at all!’ It was, rather, a walking, talking, living demonstration of our mythic conviction that, underneath all of us, Americans. . .are pretty much alike” (qtd. in Robert Nemiroff’s 1987 introduction to the play). So while Raisin in the Sun gave many Americans their first glimpse inside a private home of an African-American family, it also seemed to allow middle class white America to gloss over the systemic poverty and powerlessness that Hansberry hopes to expose. Nemiroff continues Davis’ observation: “In many reviews (and later academic studies), the Younger family. . .was transformed into an acceptably ‘middle class’ family. The decision to move became a desire to ‘integrate’ (rather than, as Mamma says simply, ‘to find the nicest house for the least amount of money for my family. . .Them houses they put up for colored in them areas way out always seem to cost twice as much.’)”

This phenomena might also help explain why Penumbra’s production took me by surprise. Perhaps I had not only relegated the play to an important historical artifact, I may have trivialized the characters by limiting their hardships and despair—as well as their wit and playfulness—to my own limited experiences. The reality of their portrayal on the stage was much more vivid and real than I could have imagined. And while I could identify with aspects of the characters, it is clear that the experiences that have brought these characters to this place on stage include subtle and not-so subtle racism and injustice, neither of which are a part of my personal experience.


A Raisin in the Sun does have some trouble spots. A couple of them may have to do with the passage of 50 years. On more than one occasion the audience hooted at a (hopefully dated) sexist comment by Walter or one of Beneatha’s suitors. But near the conclusion of the play, some members of the audience reacted with near rebellion to what surely was meant to be a moving exchange between Walter’s mother and Walter’s wife. Momma Lena expresses her pride over her son’s having stood up to the white neighborhood association representative. She tells Ruth (“Quietly, woman to woman,” according to the stage directions) “He finally come into his manhood today, didn’t he?”

While all of the characters have decisions and personal stands to make, Hansberry does develop a theme of Walter Lee needing to establish his “manhood,” so this last statement doesn’t come entirely out of the blue. Further, this concept of a strong women preventing a man’s growth was likely a prevalent view in mid century; it also likely has adherents today, despite the heckles from the audience. Earlier in the play, Momma Lena offers an assessment of her own role in thwarting Walter Lee’s development by acting as the matriarch, the head of the family. Lenna tells Walter, “Listen to me, now. I say I been wrong, son. That I been doing to you what the rest of the world been doing to you. . . .There ain’t nothing worth holding on to, money, dreams, nothing else—if it means—if it means it’s going to destroy my boy. (She takes an envelope out of her handbag and puts it in front of him, and he watches her without speaking or moving). . .It ain’t much, but it’s all I got in the world and I’m putting it in your hands. I’m telling you to be the head of this family from now on like you supposed to be.”


David Alan Anderson (Walter Lee) and Franchelle Stewart Dorn (Lena) Photo by Peter Jennings (Penumbra)

Little in the play suggests that Walter Lee has earned this new trust, and every seat in the house knows that Walter will loose every dime of that money. While the play does pivot largely on Walter Lee’s transformation, it is the growth and maturation of this family as a whole that provides the more compelling story. It also strikes me that Hansberry may have been more interested in developing this later theme than the manhood one, which may have been an after thought. I think it’s possible that Hansberry includes the manhood theme, not because she particularly found it important, but because it was simply in the air that she breathed and the water that she drank as a black writer. The motif of a black man gaining manhood status by standing up to the white man permeates much of black writing dating back to slave narratives, including Frederick Douglass’s account of his transformation from slave to man. And with this transforming stand, a man reclaims his rightful place as head of himself and his family, a position previously appropriated by wives and mothers. With 50 years of hindsight, it is easy to wonder why the 29-year-old Hansberry couldn’t recognize and challenge this myth. Perhaps she could have had she lived another 50 years. Unfortunately for us, she only had another 6 years.


I’ve made the Penumbra’s A Raisin in the Sun sound like an incredibly serious and heavy play, which, of course, it is. But it is also funny and playful play as the family members chide, and tease, and antagonize each other in a way that only family members can. The cast is simply remarkable in this production. And while the ending is not a happy-ever-after ending, it is an ending of perseverance and pride worthy of the spirits of the 5 generations of Youngers who had dreamed and toiled, laughed, and loved on this continent, preparing the way for the tumultuous years of the Civil Rights Movement to come.

A Raisin in the Sun runs through April 11 at the Guthrie in St. Paul. Visit www.guthrietheater.org for tickets and schedules.

Quotes taken from Lorraine Hansberry. A Raisin in the Sun with an introduction by Robert Nemiroff. Vintage Books: 1994.