Information, reviews, and miscellaneous shorts focusing on professional, nonprofit theater—from a Southeast Minnesota perspective.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Jon Hassler 10th Anniversary Season

John Hassler Theater

The Jon Hassler Theater marks 10 years of outstanding professional theatre in Plainview, Minnesota, boyhood home of Minnesota’s beloved novelist, Jon Hassler. To open a season-long 10th Anniversary Celebration, the Hassler comes full-circle with the return of Dear James, from the novel by Jon Hassler, adapted and directed by Sally Childs.

The Lyric Theater of Minneapolis, under the artistic direction of Sally Childs, brought stage adaptations of Hassler’s novels to Plainview beginning in 1997, when Dear James was presented at St. Joachim’s Catholic Church in front of a standing-room only crowd. Three years later, the Lyric Theater made the newly opened Jon Hassler Theater its permanent home, initiating the first season in 2000 with Grand Opening, followed by Simon’s Night in 2001.

“Ten years is a signal achievement for any non-profit enterprise, especially in view of the turbulent economy,” said Carter Martin, Jon Hassler Theater General Manager. “It’s definitely a milestone worth celebrating, and we could think of no finer vehicle than Dear James, the play that launched the Jon Hassler Theater.”

In its early years, the Theater focused on productions steeped in rural themes, including adaptations not only of Hassler’s novels but also of Boxelder Bug Variations by Bill Holm, Old Man Brunner Country, based on poems by Leo Dangel, and Bordertown Café, by Canadian playwright Kelly Rebar. As time went on, that vision expanded to include musicals in collaboration with Troupe America of Minneapolis, including How to Talk Minnesotan and Guys on Ice; challenging productions including Proof by David Auburn, Edward Albee’s Seascape, and The Pillowman by Martin McDonagh; high comedy as embodied in The Odd Couple by Neil Simon, Rounding Third by Richard Dresser, and Don’t Hug Me by Phil Olson; and Minnesota premieres including Honk! by Anthony Drew and George Stiles and Jacob Marley’s Christmas Carol by Tom Mula.

Throughout its first decade, care was taken that the Hassler regularly return to its rural roots. “Our lodestar has always been the world of the small-town,” says Martin. “No matter how far into the wider world we progress, we always remember where our home is.”

The 10th Anniversary Season:

Dear James, by Jon Hassler
June 13 - July 12

The Hassler Summer Sampler:

Boxelder Bug Variations, a Tribute to the Late Minnesota Author, Bill Holm
Saturday, August 8th, 8:00PM

What I Want to Be When I Grow Up! By David Harris
Saturday, August 22nd, 7:00PM

Revelations of Mann by David Mann
Saturday/Sunday, August 28th/29th, 8:00PM

Leaving Iowa, by Time Clue and spike Manton
September 18 - October 18

Don’t Hug Me Christmas Carol, by Phil Olson
November 5 - November 22

Visit the John Hassler Theater online for schedules and tickets: www.jonhasslertheater.org
Phone the Jon Hassler Theater at 507-534-2900.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Hedda Gabler

by Henrik Ibsen, Directed by Hal Cropp
Commonweal Theatre
April 14

Any production of Hedda Gabler revolves around the character of Hedda Gabler, who is actually Hedda Tesman after her recent marriage. I’m reminded of a comment by Jonathan Gillard Daly about his role as Richard in The Great River Shakespeare Festival’s production of Richard III. Daly realized that for the play to work, his character had to dominate every scene he was in; there could be no coasting, no letting other actors carry the energy. This is what we expect from our great hero/villains like Richard, Macbeth, or Lady Macbeth; it is part of what fascinates us about them. The Commonweal’s Adrienne Sweeny begins the play with this sort of dominance—she bursts onto the stage confident, agitated, and malicious. She insults her new Aunt, her new maid, and her new home with a calculated but seemingly unnecessary spitefulness. But ultimately, the circumstances of the play will prevent Hedda and Sweeney the opportunity of being the great villain; during the course of the play, Hedda is slowly crowded off of her own stage.

With Ibsen’s modernist approach to tragedy, Hedda’s fall from nobility began long before the play begins. At 29, her beauty and social stature are slipping away. That she has married below herself socially is reaffirmed again and again by the other character’s astonishment that she has married George Tesman. The refrain, even from Tesman himself, runs to variations of, “imagine, Hedda Gabler.” Hedda is the daughter of the great General Gabler, whose portrait hangs above the stage (and is lit between scenes, a bit too brightly, as a reminder of her former status). It’s also clear that the marriage is a step down financially. While George has prospects for an appointment at the University, Aunt Julie and Judge Parker both remark on the expense of maintaining a wife like Hedda Gabler. One can assume that her seemingly loveless marriage to George (who adores Hedda, in his detached, clueless manner) was a result of diminishing options for Hedda. Hedda’s fall is not simply a social one; she is losing control over her own life as indicated by the loss of control over her immediate surroundings.

In the Commonweal production, the Tesman drawing room is littered with crates containing Tesman’s research materials. As the play proceeds, more crates are placed on stage, literally and symbolically leaving little room for Hedda. Along with the physical space, the characters who inhabit the space further deflate Hedda by simply ignoring her meanness. Tesman’s Aunt Julie, played by Nancy Carruthers Huisenga, responds to Hedda’s slights with syrupy sweetness. Huisenga displays a slight bit of hurt after Hedda insults her prize hat, a hat she purchased especially to please Hedda, but very quickly moves beyond the insult. Later when Tesman assures Hedda that Aunt Julie has forgotten the incident, it isn’t simply a comforting gesture. Huisenga’s Aunt Julie really seems to have forgotten it, and in forgetting the insult, Hedda becomes even more invisible.

While Hedda has landed in a house that was purchased and furnished to her desires, the space is clearly not hers. Aunt Julie doesn’t live there, but her close relationship with Tesman, played by Scott Dixon, maintains her presence in the house. She is annoyingly selfless: along with giving her personal house keeper to the newlyweds, she has put up her pension to help Tesman secure this new house, she takes care of her invalid sister, and after her sister dies, she looks for another invalid to take care of. Dixon’s childish affection for his aunt (he calls her “Aunty Ju Ju” in this production) is completely genuine, and this relationship adds to the harmony in the house, a harmony that Hedda desperately attempts to disrupt. Dixon plays Tesman as a husband devoted to his new wife, without any expectations of her. He doesn’t expect her to love him, to care about his career, or to take interest in his dying Aunt Rina. He is delighted to be married to Hedda, but beyond that, he is too happy with his own world to take much notice of her. There is no place for a heroic villain in this sea of contented, selfless, bland love.

Dixon, in his brilliant portrayal of the hapless academic Tesman, has a way of ending sentences with an irritating drawn out “hmm” to punctuate his vapid convictions. He wants nothing other than the kind of love he has with his aunt, and his only hint of disapproval of Hedda comes when he asks if she couldn’t try and call his aunt “Aunty Ju Ju” instead of “Miss Tesman,” or when he asks her to visit the deathbed of Aunty Rina. He accepts refusals on both accounts without much sign of disappointment. Later, Tesman is overjoyed when Hedda (mistakenly) reveals a small amount of concern for his position at the university and actually calls him George for the first time. Hedda mockingly responds to Tesman’s euphoria by suggesting that he run and tell Aunty Ju Ju the good news. Tesman misses the insult and assures her that he will do just that. Dixon/Tesman’s inability to be wounded by Hedda makes her malice harmless, and in a sense, it further helps her disappear.

Perhaps it isn’t fair to paint Ibsen’s tragedy in terms of late 20th Century notions of identity politics, as I am certainly doing. And it would be going too far to say that Hedda is simply a victim of her environment and the confining role of women in late 19th Century society. But I think the Commonweal is right to highlight a desperation in Hedda, to underscore that this woman of power and substance has been squeezed into an insipid life with dwindling prospects of being an actor in her own life’s drama. And yet, Sweeney’s Hedda is much more complex than a hapless victim of diminishing options and oppressive circumstances. For all of her outward bravado, at pivotal moments in her life, she has stopped short of the kind of bold action that her forceful persona suggests she would take without hesitation.

Her forceful action during the play is limited to appropriations of the undertakings of the two visitors who operate on a different credo than the insipid one that pervades the Tesman home. The first of those characters is the unhappily married Thea, a timid woman who had been tormented by Hedda when they were school girls. Yet Thea, unlike Hedda, is able to take action despite her outward persona and lower social position. Thea certainly experiences the same societal limitations confronting Hedda, but Thea is able to take steps that Hedda herself would not likely ever risk. The other character is Eilert Lovborg whose last contact with Hedda involved looking at the wrong end of a dueling pistol. While Lovborg seems an unlikely hero for Hedda to attach her hopes to, she does exactly that, pinning her ultimate salvation on his ability to rise above and beyond his personal demons.

The character of Hedda Gabler is missing a couple other characteristics that might allow an audience to identify with a hero/villain. Richard in Richard III, for example, begins the play telling the audience exactly what he is going to do and why. The audience becomes both observer and conspirator in the progression of actions that Richard takes to achieve his goals. But with Hedda, the audience isn’t a conspirator; it doesn’t even understand what Hedda wants. She articulates her motivation in terms of an idealized heroic beauty. Unlike Richard’s clear and tangible goals, Hedda’s is ephemeral and skewed by her father’s understanding of military valor, her inflated sense of entitlement, and her current state of desperation and powerlessness. In short, the audience can’t see where her villainy might lead. The result is a character who is complex, realistic, and far to much like us for us to be comfortable with.


Before I saw the premiere of Hedda Gabler, I had the pleasure of listening to Ibsen Scholar Joan Templeton’s talk “Hedda Gabler, Hedda Gabler: Who Is She?” as part of the Commonweal’s 12th annual Ibsen Festival. Early in her presentation, Templeton offered a sampling from a long line of criticism on the character of Hedda, dating back to the premier performance in 1890. While a handful of reviewers saw in Hedda a strong woman, a complex human being, or a hero championing women’s rights, many reviewers saw Hedda as simply too evil to be allowed on the stage. While audiences are mesmerized by the calculated evil of other heroic villains, they have often felt revulsion for the character of Hedda. We laughed along with Templeton as she read the quotes from reviewers who obviously “didn’t get it,” who missed the oppression that Hedda faced and who clearly had outdated modes of a woman’s role in the home and in society. I think we were laughing with the secure knowledge that from our own enlightened vantage point in 2009, we would be able to see Hedda as the strong and complex character that Ibsen intended. However, after seeing the production, the nagging (and slightly embarrassing) question in my head seemed to match some of the less than enlightened reviewers: “Why does Hedda have to be so mean, especially to Aunty Ju Ju?”

Hedda Gabler plays through June 12
Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre

Friday, April 17, 2009

Shakespeare in the Park

Wenonah Players
(Drama club from Winona State University)

Wenonah Players annual tribute to/send up of Shakespeare with shorts from slect plays and related material. Shows Saturday and Sunday. Most years, the company parades from the PAC at Winona State to the Gazeebo, which means they are sometimes late. Sit close to better hear the dialog, but be warned, you might become a prop. Make sure to bow to the royalty and say Huzzah a lot.

April 18 & 19, 2 p.m.
at the Gazebo
Winona's Lake Park

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Hedda Gabler, Ibsen Fest in Lanesboro

Hedda Gabler Hedda Gabler (Adrienne Sweeney--Commonweal photo)

The kickoff to the 2009 professional theater seasons starts this weekend with the much anticipated Ibsen Festival at the Commonweal in Lanesboro, Minnesota. The festival features music, lectures, films, visual art, and of course, a full production of Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler at the Commonweal. Previews of the play run Thursday and Friday with a Saturday evening opening.

The title character of the play has recently married (much to everyone’s surprise) aspiring academic, George Tesman. As Hedda prepares to settle into the predictable role of wife to a capable, kind, but not exceptional, husband, she remains obsessed with the possibility that someone can live a life of courage and daring. More importantly, she feels the need to pull the strings that facilitate the rise of this heroic person. Perhaps as her own life moves toward the common, she needs to believe that the exceptional is still possible. Like so many of Ibsen’s characters fixated on an ideal, her obsession ripples through the other characters with predictable and unpredictable repercussions. Hedda (the character as well as the play) is a favorite among Ibsen characters for her charm, wit, and shear bravado.

Hedda Gabler runs through June 12
The 2009 Ibsen Festival runs Friday - Sunday, April 17 - 19
Visit the Commonweal for festival details: commonwealtheatre.org
Follow this link for an Ibsen Fest Schedule of Events (PDF file).

Friday, April 3, 2009

A Raisin in the Sun

by Lorraine Hansberry, directed by Lou Bellamy
Penumbra Theatre Production at the Guthrie Theatre
April 1, 2009

A year ago when I read that Penumbra and the Guthrie would be presenting Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, 50 years after its debut on Broadway, I mentally placed it on my “must see” list. I saw it as an opportunity to see a play that was a breakthrough for Hansberry and for African American writers, directors, and actors, a play that is often mentioned alongside other mid-century giants such as Death of a Salesman and The Glass Menagerie. In short, I was viewing the play as an important piece of American literary history, so I was caught off guard by the power of Penumbra’s staging.


Erika LaVonn (Ruth) and David Alan Anderson (Walter Lee) Photo by Peter Jennings (Penumbra)

I shouldn’t have been surprised. The work carries an electricity even in the reading, and I know from experience with Penumbra’s productions that what is electric on the page becomes almost unbearably real on stage. Even in the waking moments of the play, where members of the Younger family arrise in turn to take their turns in the shared bathroom (shared with other families, not just with other siblings), long held dreams were fading. The impatience evident in the terse derailed conversation between Ruth and Walter Lee let the audience know that this family is on the edge, and that this marriage and family could explode or, sadder yet, simply turn cold and bitter.

Set in post WWII Chicago, a three-generation family lives in a small two bedroom apartment. Lena Younger and her husband Walter moved to this apartment shortly after marrying and vowed that they would move to a real house in the coming years. More than thirty years later, with Big Walter dead, the Younger family still lives in the same apartment: Lena, her son Walter Lee and his wife Ruth and their 10-year-old son Travis, and Lena’s college-aged daughter Beneatha. Theirs is a story of a dream denied: Big Walter and Lena were never able to buy that house, and it still takes three adults working full-time menial jobs to cover the expenses of living in the run-down Southside apartment. Lena and Ruth hold on to the slim dream of moving to a house, a structure that could relieve the claustrophobic stress while holding their family together. Beneatha, whose exposure to ideas at college has kindled her dreams, sees new possibilities: self expression, identity, Africa, medical school. But Walter, 10 years her senior has seen his dreams fade, and on the morning the play opens, he is franticly trying not to miss a last opportunity for creating a better life.


A Raisin in the Sun’s 50 years of success with theater audiences, black and white, may stem from Hansberry’s ability to articulate a sense of accumulated loss and disappointment over missed dreams in a way that many people can identify with on some level. For example, Walter Lee’s impatient and single-minded obsession with his clearly doomed liquor store scheme is irrationally childish and dangerous to the family’s equilibrium. Yet when the deal goes awry and the family’s money is stolen, the audience’s anger at Walter is tempered by empathy because most people have either been that reckless obsessed child or loved a person with that recklessness. As a mark of a good play, it’s easy for the audience to see a part of itself on stage.


Adeoye (Joseph Asagai) and Bakesta King (Beneatha) Photo by Tim Fuller (Penumbra)

Yet, according to actor and playwright Ossie Davis, who replaced Sidney Poitier in the original Broadway production, this identification caused a problem for a play that set out to draw attention to the plight of black Americans at a specific time and place. Davis says, “One of the biggest selling points about Raisin. . .was how much the Younger family was just like any other American family. Some people were ecstatic to find that ‘it didn’t really have to be about Negroes at all!’ It was, rather, a walking, talking, living demonstration of our mythic conviction that, underneath all of us, Americans. . .are pretty much alike” (qtd. in Robert Nemiroff’s 1987 introduction to the play). So while Raisin in the Sun gave many Americans their first glimpse inside a private home of an African-American family, it also seemed to allow middle class white America to gloss over the systemic poverty and powerlessness that Hansberry hopes to expose. Nemiroff continues Davis’ observation: “In many reviews (and later academic studies), the Younger family. . .was transformed into an acceptably ‘middle class’ family. The decision to move became a desire to ‘integrate’ (rather than, as Mamma says simply, ‘to find the nicest house for the least amount of money for my family. . .Them houses they put up for colored in them areas way out always seem to cost twice as much.’)”

This phenomena might also help explain why Penumbra’s production took me by surprise. Perhaps I had not only relegated the play to an important historical artifact, I may have trivialized the characters by limiting their hardships and despair—as well as their wit and playfulness—to my own limited experiences. The reality of their portrayal on the stage was much more vivid and real than I could have imagined. And while I could identify with aspects of the characters, it is clear that the experiences that have brought these characters to this place on stage include subtle and not-so subtle racism and injustice, neither of which are a part of my personal experience.


A Raisin in the Sun does have some trouble spots. A couple of them may have to do with the passage of 50 years. On more than one occasion the audience hooted at a (hopefully dated) sexist comment by Walter or one of Beneatha’s suitors. But near the conclusion of the play, some members of the audience reacted with near rebellion to what surely was meant to be a moving exchange between Walter’s mother and Walter’s wife. Momma Lena expresses her pride over her son’s having stood up to the white neighborhood association representative. She tells Ruth (“Quietly, woman to woman,” according to the stage directions) “He finally come into his manhood today, didn’t he?”

While all of the characters have decisions and personal stands to make, Hansberry does develop a theme of Walter Lee needing to establish his “manhood,” so this last statement doesn’t come entirely out of the blue. Further, this concept of a strong women preventing a man’s growth was likely a prevalent view in mid century; it also likely has adherents today, despite the heckles from the audience. Earlier in the play, Momma Lena offers an assessment of her own role in thwarting Walter Lee’s development by acting as the matriarch, the head of the family. Lenna tells Walter, “Listen to me, now. I say I been wrong, son. That I been doing to you what the rest of the world been doing to you. . . .There ain’t nothing worth holding on to, money, dreams, nothing else—if it means—if it means it’s going to destroy my boy. (She takes an envelope out of her handbag and puts it in front of him, and he watches her without speaking or moving). . .It ain’t much, but it’s all I got in the world and I’m putting it in your hands. I’m telling you to be the head of this family from now on like you supposed to be.”


David Alan Anderson (Walter Lee) and Franchelle Stewart Dorn (Lena) Photo by Peter Jennings (Penumbra)

Little in the play suggests that Walter Lee has earned this new trust, and every seat in the house knows that Walter will loose every dime of that money. While the play does pivot largely on Walter Lee’s transformation, it is the growth and maturation of this family as a whole that provides the more compelling story. It also strikes me that Hansberry may have been more interested in developing this later theme than the manhood one, which may have been an after thought. I think it’s possible that Hansberry includes the manhood theme, not because she particularly found it important, but because it was simply in the air that she breathed and the water that she drank as a black writer. The motif of a black man gaining manhood status by standing up to the white man permeates much of black writing dating back to slave narratives, including Frederick Douglass’s account of his transformation from slave to man. And with this transforming stand, a man reclaims his rightful place as head of himself and his family, a position previously appropriated by wives and mothers. With 50 years of hindsight, it is easy to wonder why the 29-year-old Hansberry couldn’t recognize and challenge this myth. Perhaps she could have had she lived another 50 years. Unfortunately for us, she only had another 6 years.


I’ve made the Penumbra’s A Raisin in the Sun sound like an incredibly serious and heavy play, which, of course, it is. But it is also funny and playful play as the family members chide, and tease, and antagonize each other in a way that only family members can. The cast is simply remarkable in this production. And while the ending is not a happy-ever-after ending, it is an ending of perseverance and pride worthy of the spirits of the 5 generations of Youngers who had dreamed and toiled, laughed, and loved on this continent, preparing the way for the tumultuous years of the Civil Rights Movement to come.

A Raisin in the Sun runs through April 11 at the Guthrie in St. Paul. Visit www.guthrietheater.org for tickets and schedules.

Quotes taken from Lorraine Hansberry. A Raisin in the Sun with an introduction by Robert Nemiroff. Vintage Books: 1994.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Early Spring Productions

The spring season is already under way in Winona with St. Mary’s University production of A Chorus Line, which runs through Monday. Vivian Fussillo’s take on Moleire’s The Imaginary Invalid plays next week at Winona State University, Thursday through Saturday.

A Chorus Line (Katie Derus)
The 17-member kick line rehearses for Saint Mary’s University’s production of A Chorus Line. (photo by Katie Derus/Winona Daily News)
Imaginary Patient (Katie Derus)
Ryan Hawkins, right, and Ali Dilger in WSU’s The Imaginary Invalid. (photo by Katie Derus/Winona Daily News)
The Senator Wore Pantyhose (Rory O’Driscoll)
Karen Dulak, left and Ann Kohner rehearse a scene from the dress rehearsal of The Senator Wore Pantyhose. (Photo by Rory O’Driscoll/Winona Daily News)
You're a Good Man Charlie Brown
From left, Chris Bernard, Emily Whitcomb, Derek Sveen, Abbey Quandahl, Hunter Tibor and Emily Quandahl rehearse "You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown."(Photo by Fred Schulze/Winona Daily News)

Next week also has two community theater offerings: The Fountain City Players with The Senator Wore Panythose and Rock Solid Youth Center with You’re a Good Man Charlie Brown.

For the second year, spring also means the Commonweal’s annual Ibsen Festival and production of Ibsen. The Festival runs April 17 - 19 with Hedda Gabler opening April 16 for a two month run. Visit the Commonweal for details.

A Chorus Line

Music by Marvin Hamlisch, Lyrics by Edward Kleban,
Directed by Judy Meyers
St. Mary’s Department of Theater Arts

Mar. 27 - 30
Fri., Sat., Mon. shows at 7:30 pm, Sun. at 3 pm
Page Theatre

See story from Winona Daily News Visit the Page Theatre website for schedule and ticket information.

The Imaginary Invalid

by Moliere, Directed by Vivian Fusillo
Winona State Department of Theatre and Dance
April 2-4, 2009, 7:30 p.m.
WSU Performing Arts Center Mainstage

See story from Winona Daily News.
Visit the Winona State Theater and Dance Department website for schedule and ticket information.

The Senator Wore Panythose

by Billy Van Zandt and jane Milmore, Directed by Juddee Brone

Fountain City River Players
April 1 - 5, 7:30 p.m. (Sunday, 2 p.m.)
Fountain City Auditorium
42 N. Main St., Fountain City, Wisconsin.
608-687-7481

See the story from the Winona Daily News

You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown

by Clark Gesner, directeed by Sue Degallier
Rock Solid Youth Center
April 2 - 4, 7:30 p.m.
April 5, 4:00 p.m.
75 West 3rd Street, Winona, MN
507 452-2125

See the story from the Winona Daily News

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Commonweal Apprentices featured in Private Eyes

Private Eyes
by Steven Dietz
Commonweal Theatre Apprentice Class

The Commonweal’s first apprentice class culminates their 10 months of study at the Commonweal with a full production of Steven Dietz’s Private Eyes. The apprenticeship program is designed for advanced college and post graduate students seeking more experience in the areas of acting, directing, and theater administration. Apprentices have played important roles on stage and behind the scenes during the 2008 season productions including memorable performances in A Christmas Carol, Ice Maidens, Harvey, and Man of La Mancha. The Commonweal audience has had ample opportunity to come to know and enjoy these talented young artists.

This play only runs this weekend, and the Commonweal strongly suggests reserving tickets.

Here is the commonweal’s play synopsis:

Deceit and intrigue simmer just below the surface in this dark comedy in which five individuals discover what it means to lie to everyone around them, including themselves. Featuring Apprentice Company members Mike Davidovich, David Harmann, Sarah Kathryn Hawkins, Brad Kastendick, and Kimberly Maas.

Private Eyes runs March 12 - March 15

Coming in April at the Commonweal:
2009 Ibsen Festival, April 17 - 19.
Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler, April 16 - June 12

Visit the Commonweal for schedules and tickets: Commonweal Theatre